USED Releases Guidance on Ed Tech in Schools and Annual Update on FERPA and PPRA

August 27, 2026

Ed Tech Update: Last week, USED released non-binding guidance on Responsible Use of Education Technology in the Classroom. A review of the guidance finds it to be measured, consistent with current practice and not likely to be of major consequence to schools. Non-binding guidance means it is a resource that can be taken under consideration but for which there is no mechanism of enforcement. The guidance encourages SEAs, LEAs, educators, families, and education technology providers to take a more intentional, evidence-based approach to technology use in classrooms. The guidance emphasizes that technology decisions should prioritize instructional value and student learning outcomes rather than recreational engagement or simply increasing screen time. It calls on districts to select tools with demonstrated effectiveness, regularly evaluate their impact, provide educator training, and ensure transparency around how technology is used and how student data is handled. The guidance encourages providers to minimize unnecessary screen time and build tools that strengthen instruction and are supported by evidence. Importantly, the guidance suggests that schools should be willing to discontinue technology tools that do not demonstrate meaningful benefits for student learning. For school leaders, the guidance offers five key questions to consider: What learning problem does the tool solve, when and for whom should it be used, for how long, and what evidence shows that it improves student learning? The guidance appropriately affirms that these decisions are the purview of state and local education agencies, and that not all screen time is created equal. 

 

Privacy Update: USED sent state and local education agencies their annual notice of obligations under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA). In this year’s Dear Colleague letter, there is more focus on PPRA than there was last year, and the cover letter changes PPRA interpretation to require parental opt-in for all surveys addressing one of the eight protected categories of information (before this letter, the standard for optional surveys was opt-out). There are other notable aspects as well, including the mention that schools may want to consult their attorneys about developing policies around the use of personal devices and edtech to protect students consistent with or in the absence of state law. Given increased interest from the administration in using FERPA for enforcement on districts, AASA advocacy is paying close attention to any communication in this privacy policy space and will continue to update members on the blog.
  • Background: FERPA and PPRA are federal privacy laws enforced by the Department's SPPO. FERPA protects the privacy of students’ education records and safeguards parents’ rights to access their children’s education records, seek amendments to those records, and exercise control over the disclosure of personally identifiable information. PPRA requires school administers to provide an opt-out opportunity to families when deploying surveys or evaluations asking students for certain sensitive and private information.