AASA Releases Findings From School Discipline Survey
Today AASA is releasing an important survey of 950 superintendents in 47 states that analyzes the influence the 2014 Dear
Colleague Letter on the Nondiscriminatory Administration of School Discipline (referred
to hereafter as “the 2014 discipline guidance) on district discipline policies
and practices. You can access the analysis here.
Originally when the 2014 guidance and the application of a disparate
impact analysis was issued to by the Office of Civil Rights, AASA released a strongly worded statement that
we did not think this analysis was appropriate and we felt it was going to be
especially difficult for districts to comply with the new requirements given
that no funding was dedicated at the federal level to improving discipline practices
and policies.
There has been intense speculation that the Office of Civil
Rights (OCR) will rescind the 2014 discipline guidance and AASA had the
opportunity to meet with officials at the U.S. Department of Education about
the guidance this spring to share our views. To better inform our discussions
with the Department and other stakeholders AASA partnered with the Association of Educational Service Agencies and ASBO International to ascertain the impact of
the 2014 discipline guidance on school districts. Specifically, we sought to
understand how the 2014 discipline guidance is perceived in the field as well
as how the increasingly aggressive processes that existed under the Obama
Administration for investigating individual discipline complaints under Title
IV and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act had influenced district policies and
practices.
FINDINGS
- The 2014 discipline guidance itself had a very
limited impact on changing district discipline policies and practices. Given that only 16 percent of district leaders surveyed in 2018 indicated their
district has modified their school discipline policies and practices because of
the 2014 discipline guidance, we cannot say that it is having the positive or
negative effects some advocates are claiming.
- More
generalized pressure from OCR to address discipline disparities has changed
local policies and practices in a different and more substantial way than the
guidance. Beginning in 2009, OCR opened hundreds of investigations or
compliance reviews that forced districts to change discipline practices and
policies. The noticeable uptick in
investigations and compliance reviews over the last nine years seems to have
acted as a more powerful lever in influencing districts to reduce out-of-school
time for students even if teachers, parents or students preferred for that
specific child to be removed from class.
CONTINUATION OF THE 2014 DISCIPLINE GUIDANCE
Whether the 2014
discipline guidance should stay or go is not something AASA can adequately
weigh in on, given the feedback from our survey and our interviews with school
leaders. AASA continues to worry about the application of the disparate
impact analysis in the K-12 educational context and whether it is appropriate.
However, AASA believes the expanded reach of OCR in how it investigates
districts for alleged discrimination in student discipline practices is the
most substantial problem for districts that can and should be addressed at the
federal level. The adoption of a new case-processing manual at OCR and a
narrowing of the types of unwritten disciplinary practices OCR can request
should make a meaningful positive difference. Outside of OCR’s pace and style
of investigating discipline discrimination, the 2014 discipline guidance itself
has not been transformative in changing discipline policies and practices for
districts.