AASA, 5 National Rural and Education Associations Express Deep Concern with FCC’s Proposed E-Rate Changes
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Alexandria, Va. – June 30, 2014 – Today, AASA, The School Superintendents Association, joined five other national education and rural education associations to release a statement expressing deep concern with FCC's proposed changes to the E-Rate program. Representing educators, administrators, rural state associations and federally impacted districts, the letter highlights the groups’ general concerns with the proposal, as well as identifying the aspects most problematic to the nation’s rural schools.
AASA joined the Association of Educational Service Agencies, the National Association of Federally Impacted Schools, the National Rural Education Association, the National Rural Education Advocacy Coalition, and the Rural Schools and Community Trust to release the statement, highlighting support for modernization while identifying aspects of the FCC's proposal that are in direct conflict with their stated goal of ensuring that rural schools have access to connectivity comparable to that of urban and suburban communities. The statement comes one the heels of AASA's recent call to action, urging superintendents and school leaders to contact the FCC and weigh in on the changes.
“Rural educators are frustrated to find that after more than a decade of suggesting improvements to the E-Rate program, including proposals to expand teleconnectivity access to the nation’s rural communities and to streamline the application process, the FCC’s proposal is largely focused on cost-savings and efficiencies. We feel it needs to focus more on program equity and sustainability while bolstering efforts to ensure rural communities have access to levels of connectivity comparable (in terms of both bandwidth and cost) to those in urban and suburban communities.
“As recently as one year ago, we were optimistic for comprehensive E-Rate modernization and what it could mean for our rural communities: With both the White House and the FCC focused on E-Rate modernization, surely the President’s goal of connecting 99 percent of the nation’s students in five years would reflect the unique considerations required to expand sustainable broadband to rural communities—areas that have historically and disproportionately been underserved in the E-Rate program.
“We oppose the proposed shift to a per-pupil allocation as it fails to recognize the variance in costs and purchasing power that exist in our rural schools and communities. Beyond being “directly opposed” to one of the E-Rate program’s core tenets—distributing funding based on need—the proposal completely dismisses the reality of connectivity in rural communities, focusing on a ‘one-size-fits-all’ model regardless of a school’s enrollment or geographic location. We are strongly opposed to any effort to shift away from a needs-based formula to a per-pupil allocation. Our opposition to per-pupil allocations in E-Rate is well documented and can be found in E-Rate-related filings reaching back as far as 2005.
“We are also opposed to shifting the program’s poverty calculation from school-based to district-based. We represent rural schools that may find themselves within larger school districts with varying poverty rates. The proposed change sets up potential windfalls for the wealthiest schools within relatively poor districts by raising their discount rates and hurts the poorer schools within districts by lowering their discount rates.
“Any effort to modernize the E-Rate program must include the infusion of new, sustained funding. Our nation’s rural schools and libraries struggle to meet today’s broadband demand using 1998 dollars and current demand for the E-Rate program more than doubles the available funding. This funding shortfall is compounded by variations in costs and purchasing power for our rural communities.
“Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, we reiterate our long-standing commitment to E-Rate modernization and affirm our willingness to work with the FCC to improve this proposal. We urge the Commission to work with the beneficiary community—the very people the program was designed to serve—on a two-pronged approach that relies on both programmatic changes and the infusion of new, long-term funding. We stand ready to update the E-Rate program as it approaches its 20-year birthday and to do so in a manner that ensures it is around for at least 20 more.”
For more information, contact Noelle Ellerson at firstname.lastname@example.org or visit AASA’s The Leading Edge blog.
# # #
AASA, The School Superintendents Association, founded in 1865, is the professional organization for more than 10,000 educational leaders in the United States and throughout the world. AASA’s mission is to support and develop effective school system leaders who are dedicated to the highest quality public education for all children. For more information, visit www.aasa.org.